Question 1
Which of the following would not have to be proved when claiming under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher?
[1 mark]
Answer
Which of the following would not have to be proved when claiming under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher?
[1 mark]
Which of the following is not a remedy available to a claimant in the tort of private nuisance?
[1 mark]
In relation to a mediation hearing, which of the following statements is false ?
[1 mark]
Which of the following is not a feature of a case brought in the civil courts?
[1 mark]
Which of the following best describes repeal as a method of law reform?
[1 mark]
Explain three of the stages in the House of Commons during the process of creating an Act of Parliament.
[5 marks]
Suggest two factors that the court might have taken into account when reaching its decision that Bess’s activities amounted to an unlawful or unreasonable interference under private nuisance.
[5 marks]
Taking into account the rules of negligence, advise Debbie of her rights against Craig.
[10 marks]
Examine the connection between law and morality. Discuss whether the rules for secondary victims claiming for psychiatric injury in negligence reflect morality.
[15 marks]
Taking into account the law of occupiers’ liability, consider the rights and remedies of Frank against Ella and of Gemma against Ella.
[30 marks]
Consider the rights and remedies of Les against Kanish and of Les against Bluebricks in relation to the sale of his house.
There are rules which restrict when a claimant can recover for pure economic loss in tort. Assess the reasons why restrictions on recovery for pure economic loss exist.
[30 marks]
The paper as printed
Spotted a mistake on this page?Report a problem