All papers

Physics · AQA 7408 · Paper 3 Section B: Turning points in physics · June 2022

AQA A Level Physics Paper 3 Section B: Turning points in physics June 2022 question paper 7408/3BD

35 marks

Practise the past exam questions by topic

AQA 7408 · Paper 3BD

4 questions
Report a problem
What is wrong?

Goes to whoever maintains the question split. No account needed and nothing is published on this page.

Question 1

In the 17th century, Isaac Newton proposed a theory to explain some of the properties of light. An alternative theory of light was proposed by Christiaan Huygens at about the same time.

A student uses the arrangement in Figure 1 to investigate the two theories.

Figure for question 1

The student observes two bright white lines on the screen.

Explain how this observation supports Newton’s theory of light.

[2 marks]

Answer
Mark scheme for question 1.1

The student makes alterations to the apparatus in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the red and dark fringes that the student now observes on the screen.

Figure for question 1

Identify the alterations made by the student and explain how the observations in Figure 2 support Huygens’ theory of light.

In your answer you should:

• identify alterations made to the apparatus in Figure 1

• outline the key features of Huygens’ theory

• explain how the result of this experiment supports Huygens’ theory.

[6 marks]

Answer
Mark scheme for question 1.2

Answer space for this question continues on the next page

Shortly before the work of Newton and Huygens, Francesco Grimaldi carried out an experiment into the behaviour of light. Figure 3 shows Grimaldi’s arrangement.

Figure for question 1

A bright white light source is used to illuminate a small circular aperture, AB. The light from this aperture illuminates a second, slightly larger circular aperture, CD.

The light passing through both apertures arrives at a screen.

Newton’s theory and Huygens’ theory make different predictions about the appearance of the light on the screen.

Discuss these differences in appearance.

[3 marks]

Answer
Mark scheme for question 1.3

Question 2

Robert Millikan experimented with oil drops to determine a value for the electronic charge.

Figure 4 shows a stationary oil droplet between two horizontal metal plates. The plates are connected to a variable voltage supply so that the upper plate is positive. The oil droplet has mass m and charge Q.

Figure for question 2

State and explain the sign of the charge on the oil droplet.

[1 mark]

Answer
Mark scheme for question 2.1

The variable voltage supply is set to zero volts. The oil drop falls. The constant speed v1 of the falling oil droplet is found to be 3.8 × 10−5 m s−1 and the following measurements are recorded:

density of oil = 910 kg m−3 viscosity of air = 1.8 × 10−5 N s m−2

Show that the mass m of the oil droplet is about 8 × 10−16 kg.

[3 marks]

Answer
Mark scheme for question 2.2

The variable voltage supply is adjusted so that the oil droplet rises at a constant speed v2. The potential difference (pd) across the plates is V and the distance between the plates is d.

In his experiment, Millikan measured the constant speed v1 of a falling droplet when the pd was zero. He compared this with the speed v2 of the same droplet when the droplet was made to rise.

Question 2, shown as an image

[2 marks]

Answer
Mark scheme for question 2.3

The following measurements are made for the droplet in Question 02.2 when it is rising at constant speed.

V = 715 V

Question 2, shown as an image

The separation of the plates d = 11.6 mm.

Deduce, using the equation in Question 02.3, whether the value of the charge for this droplet is consistent with the currently accepted value of the electronic charge.

[3 marks]

Answer
Mark scheme for question 2.4

After Millikan published his results, it was found that he had used a value for the viscosity of air that was smaller than the actual value.

Discuss the effect this error had on Millikan’s value of the electronic charge.

[3 marks]

Answer
Mark scheme for question 2.5

Question 3

Figure 5 shows the arrangement used by Fizeau to determine the speed of light.

Figure for question 3

The toothed wheel W is rotated and the reflected light from a distant mirror M is observed.

The speed of light is calculated from the equation

Question 3, shown as an image

where d is the distance from W to M and n is the number of teeth on the rotating wheel W.

State what f0 represents in the equation.

[2 marks]

The experiment is attempted using a rotating wheel with 720 teeth that can be rotated at up to 620 revolutions per minute. The distance between W and M is 8.5 km.

Deduce whether the speed of light can be determined with this particular arrangement.

[2 marks]

The determination of the speed of light took on extra significance when Maxwell derived the wave-speed equation

Question 3, shown as an image

State how ε0 and µ0 are related to the types of field in the wave.

µ0

[2 marks]

Question 4

Bertozzi investigated how the kinetic energy of electrons varies with speed.

Which graph shows the variation of kinetic energy with speed? Tick (maths symbol) one box.

Figure for question 4

[1 mark]

Calculate the speed of a particle when its kinetic energy is equal to its rest energy.

[3 marks]

speed = m s−1

Discuss the change in the observed mass of a spring when it is stretched.

[2 marks]

The paper as printed

Spotted a mistake on this page?Report a problem