Interpretations B and C both make judgements about the reign of Elizabeth I.
How far do they differ and what might explain any differences?
Interpretation B
An extract from an article published in a national British newspaper on 24 March 2003 to mark the 400th anniversary of the death of Elizabeth I.
Tolerance and religious balance emerged during Elizabeth’s reign. Seas were navigated and an empire embarked upon. Our small nation defended itself against larger enemies and found a voice and a purpose. Something in Elizabeth’s reign taught us what our country is, and why it matters. And as her reign created a sense of national identity that had not existed before, so Elizabeth herself came to represent our best qualities: courageous, independent, eccentric, amusing and reasonable. The greatest prince this country has produced was a prince in skirts.
Interpretation C
An extract from the introduction to a recent book called ‘Elizabeth I’ by the historian Christopher Haigh.
For many years, historians have portrayed Elizabeth as an English heroine. They say she healed the wounds of religious division; brought order and stability; defeated the threat from Catholic Europe; and sent ships to set up an empire.
But now it all looks different. We now know that Catholic loyalties remained strong. We now know that Puritans who wanted further religious change were not just a minority who could be ignored – they were in Elizabeth’s Court and Council, as well as in Parliament. We now know that the nobility remained powerful, and could be driven to plot against Elizabeth. We now know that England was militarily weak, that wars were badly planned, and that fear of invasion was often serious. It now seems that attempts to set up colonies were small-scale and unsuccessful.
There is not much sign of a golden age. Elizabeth I was a very smart woman in a very difficult situation. But she was not a political genius who got everything right.